[
  {
    "id": "GN-R",
    "author": "Gregory Nazianzen",
    "title": "Oration 29 (Third Theological Oration)",
    "locus": "§16; NPNF second series VII, pp. 306–307",
    "url": "https://ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf207/npnf207.iii.xv.html",
    "status": "Primary translation directly consulted this page",
    "edition": "Charles Gordon Browne and James Edward Swallow, NPNF second series VII; CCEL transcription; no fresh Greek critical collation",
    "claim": "Father names relation rather than essence or action",
    "establishes": "A category distinction: genuine personal difference need not imply different divine nature or created product",
    "limit": "Eternal personal origin does not establish a relational account of free divine action. The Son is begotten, not created; personal origin must not be equated with created dependence.",
    "quote": "it is the name of the Relation in which the Father stands to the Son, and the Son to the Father.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "direct"
  },
  {
    "id": "GN-A",
    "author": "Gregory Nazianzen",
    "title": "Oration 29",
    "locus": "§§6–8",
    "url": "https://ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf207/npnf207.iii.xv.html",
    "status": "Primary translation directly consulted this page",
    "edition": "Browne/Swallow, NPNF second series VII; CCEL",
    "claim": "Willing is not an intermediary object replacing the agent; corporeal divisions must not be projected into divine generation",
    "establishes": "A warning against treating willing as an object between God and the act, or confusing generation with creation",
    "limit": "The argument against Eunomius concerns generation, rather than a complete modern account of free creation. Editorial notes are not Gregory’s words.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "direct"
  },
  {
    "id": "DN-R",
    "author": "Pseudo-Dionysius",
    "title": "Divine Names",
    "locus": "II.5; Rolt pp. 71–73",
    "url": "https://ccel.org/ccel/rolt/dionysius/dionysius.iv.iii.html",
    "status": "Primary translation directly consulted this page",
    "edition": "C. E. Rolt (1920), CCEL; older reliable historical translation, not newly collated against Luibheid/Rorem",
    "claim": "Receptor differences can explain different seal impressions without partitioning the archetype",
    "establishes": "Recipient variation does not entail corresponding partition or alteration of source",
    "limit": "A seal has intrinsic pattern; receptor analogy is not a simplicity proof or explanation of free choice; God exceeds the analogy",
    "quote": "the difference of the substances which share it makes the impressions of the one, entire, identical archetype to be different.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "direct"
  },
  {
    "id": "DN-E",
    "author": "Pseudo-Dionysius",
    "title": "Divine Names",
    "locus": "V.8; Rolt pp. 139–141",
    "url": "https://ccel.org/ccel/rolt/dionysius/dionysius.iv.vi.html",
    "status": "Primary translation directly consulted this page",
    "edition": "C. E. Rolt (1920), CCEL; editorial commentary separated",
    "claim": "Exemplars preexist unifiedly and are divine beneficent volitions",
    "establishes": "Positive intelligible differentiation in relation to one source",
    "limit": "Plural exemplars or divine wills do not by themselves prove alternative created outcomes, or establish that divine intentions differ only relationally",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "direct"
  },
  {
    "id": "DN-K",
    "author": "Pseudo-Dionysius",
    "title": "Divine Names",
    "locus": "VII.2–3; Rolt pp. 149–153",
    "url": "https://ccel.org/ccel/rolt/dionysius/dionysius.iv.viii.html",
    "status": "Primary translation directly consulted this page",
    "edition": "C. E. Rolt (1920), CCEL; editorial commentary separated",
    "claim": "Divine causal self-knowledge does not derive from effects; creaturely knowledge follows created ordering without comprehensive grasp",
    "establishes": "Different effects, God’s knowledge, and a recipient’s acquired knowledge require distinct accounts",
    "limit": "Does not independently explain choice between possible creations, or knowledge of permitted creaturely decisions. Rolt’s editorial comments about being beyond personality are not adopted.",
    "quote": "the Mind of God gains not Its knowledge of things from those things",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "direct"
  },
  {
    "id": "DN-L",
    "author": "Pseudo-Dionysius",
    "title": "Divine Names",
    "locus": "IX.6–7; Rolt pp. 166–167",
    "url": "https://ccel.org/ccel/rolt/dionysius/dionysius.iv.x.html",
    "status": "Primary translation directly consulted this page",
    "edition": "C. E. Rolt (1920), CCEL",
    "claim": "Causal likeness is nonreciprocal; finite effects are like and unlike source in different respects",
    "establishes": "Meaningful likeness does not require a shared nature",
    "limit": "Does not prove that every effect resembles its cause in every respect",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "direct"
  },
  {
    "id": "NY-M",
    "author": "Gregory of Nyssa",
    "title": "On the Making of Man",
    "locus": "XVI",
    "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/standardebooks/gregory-of-nyssa_on-the-making-of-man_william-moore_henry-austin-wilson/master/src/epub/text/chapter-16.xhtml",
    "status": "Primary translation reconsulted from original project",
    "edition": "William Moore and Henry Austin Wilson, NPNF second series V; Standard Ebooks transcription with scan-check provenance",
    "claim": "Likeness in attributes differs from created/uncreated mode; created goods are measured and virtue voluntary",
    "establishes": "Created limitations need not limit the source; receiving rational agency is compatible with voluntary action",
    "limit": "Speculative anthropology is not a universally established metaphysical principle. The Life of Moses passages on infinity were not newly read.",
    "quote": "virtue is a voluntary thing, subject to no dominion",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "direct"
  },
  {
    "id": "MX-D",
    "author": "Maximus the Confessor",
    "title": "Ambiguum 7",
    "locus": "PG 91, 1077–1081, transcription ΠΡ 2.11–2.16; knowledge passage ΠΡ 2.20 within columns 1085–1088",
    "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/robertvsiii/maximus-confessor/5ef8d8b33bb7e16576f4b5445db7ee07541aff9f/texts/maximus/maximus_confessor.ambigua_iohannem.tess",
    "status": "Provisional Greek primary witness reconsulted; modern reliable edition collation outstanding",
    "edition": "Undocumented Greek transcription; consult Nicholas Constas, Ambigua (2014) for critical control",
    "claim": "Logoi and divine knowledge are distinguished from creatures obtaining actuality at appropriate times; one Logos grounds differentiated logoi",
    "establishes": "Intelligibility and realized history are distinct; temporal realization need not imply acquired divine knowledge",
    "limit": "No English quotation is attributed to Constas. The text does not establish that divine intentions differ only relationally, prove alternative creations, or eliminate historical disagreements.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "provisional"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-BON-FIRST",
    "author": "Bonaventure",
    "title": "Commentary on the First Book of Sentences",
    "locus": "I Sent., d. 8, p. II, a. un., q. 1, arguments 1–2 (inherited register B12)",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bonaventure/",
    "status": "Inherited primary audit; not freshly critical-collated. URL is specialist orientation, not the Latin witness.",
    "edition": "Opera omnia, vol. I, Quaracchi, 1882; Latin transcription audit inherited from Being-First. English quotation is manuscript working translation.",
    "claim": "An absolutely first source does not receive the actuality of its perfection from something distinct.",
    "establishes": "Arguments from firstness and essential perfection help test dependence on constituents; different attributes need not be parts of perfection.",
    "limit": "Does not identify God with every known object or relation to a creature. The modern argument from dependence on constituents is a reconstruction.",
    "quote": "Whatever is whatever it has is most simple.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited",
    "url_role": "Specialist orientation; not the directly consulted primary witness"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-BON-FULL",
    "author": "Bonaventure",
    "title": "Commentary on the First Book of Sentences",
    "locus": "I Sent., d. 8, p. II, a. un., q. 1, ad 1 (inherited register B13)",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bonaventure/",
    "status": "Inherited primary audit; URL is specialist orientation.",
    "edition": "Opera omnia, vol. I, Quaracchi, 1882; working English translation in supplied manuscript.",
    "claim": "Supreme noble simplicity signifies supreme actuality and communication.",
    "establishes": "Positive fullness rather than deficient featurelessness; the immediate communication argument is Trinitarian.",
    "limit": "Does not entail that this world or any created world necessarily exists. Nonreception alone does not establish fullness.",
    "quote": "Where supreme simplicity is understood, supreme actuality must be understood.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited",
    "url_role": "Specialist orientation; not the directly consulted primary witness"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-BON-ORIGIN",
    "author": "Bonaventure",
    "title": "Commentary on the First Book of Sentences",
    "locus": "I Sent., d. 8, p. II, a. un., q. 1, ad 2 (inherited register B13)",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bonaventure/",
    "status": "Inherited primary audit; paraphrase of manuscript source discussion, no new critical collation.",
    "edition": "Opera omnia, vol. I, Quaracchi, 1882; prior manuscript Latin-transcription audit.",
    "claim": "Distinction by origin differs from difference by addition.",
    "establishes": "Theologically affirmed personal origins need not be added parts that constitute divine perfection.",
    "limit": "Trinitarian personal origin, created dependence, and free creative action need distinct accounts. This argument neither proves the Trinity nor explains every condition of free divine action.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited",
    "url_role": "Specialist orientation; not the directly consulted primary witness"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-BON-MEASURE",
    "author": "Bonaventure",
    "title": "Itinerarium mentis in Deum",
    "locus": "II.10 (inherited register N6)",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bonaventure/",
    "status": "Inherited primary quotation; Latin Library access failed on this pass, no new critical collation.",
    "edition": "Opera omnia, vol. V, Quaracchi, 1891; manuscript working English translation of Latin Library transcription.",
    "claim": "Proportion contributes positively to beauty and delight.",
    "establishes": "A historical resource for finite measure as a positive condition of an achieved good.",
    "limit": "Melody, learning, and finite-history tests are constructive extensions; does not show every finite limitation or loss is good.",
    "quote": "Beauty and delight are not without proportion.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited",
    "url_role": "Specialist orientation; not the directly consulted primary witness"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-BON-SEP",
    "author": "Tim Noone and R. E. Houser",
    "title": "Bonaventure, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy",
    "locus": "§5 opening; §5.2 participation/aitiological argument; selected truth discussion",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bonaventure/",
    "status": "Fresh publisher consultation of selected passages, 12 October 2026.",
    "edition": "Substantive revision 16 August 2023; current publisher text.",
    "claim": "Exemplar causality unifies finite intelligible expression with efficient and final causality.",
    "establishes": "Supplies Hexaëmeron 6.1 (Quaracchi V:360) and 1.13 (V:331), and a specialist account of participation and transcendental versus categorical attributes.",
    "limit": "Those Hexaëmeron primary loci were secondary-located, not freshly collated; the article interpretation does not establish the proposed account of divine agency.",
    "source_type": "secondary",
    "consultation_class": "secondary"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-ERI-APPEAR",
    "author": "John Scottus Eriugena",
    "title": "Periphyseon (The Division of Nature)",
    "locus": "I.446D; printed p. 31; inherited manuscript register E11 (inherited register E11)",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scottus-eriugena/",
    "status": "Inherited supplied primary translation; no new critical Latin collation. URL is specialist orientation.",
    "edition": "Translated by I. P. Sheldon-Williams, revised by John J. O’Meara, Bellarmin/Dumbarton Oaks, 1987.",
    "claim": "Theophanic appearance can be created and distinct from the divine essence.",
    "establishes": "A distinction between the source and how it appears, relevant to the recipient’s conditions.",
    "limit": "Does not cancel the stronger God–creature unity passages or by itself explain divine self-knowledge.",
    "quote": "It is not His Essence that (the prophet) saw, but something created by Him.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited",
    "url_role": "Specialist orientation; not the directly consulted primary witness"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-ERI-EXPRESSION",
    "author": "John Scottus Eriugena",
    "title": "Periphyseon (The Division of Nature)",
    "locus": "I.454B–C; printed p. 40; inherited manuscript register E4 (inherited register E4)",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scottus-eriugena/",
    "status": "Inherited supplied primary quotation, not freshly critical-collated.",
    "edition": "Sheldon-Williams/O’Meara translation, 1987.",
    "claim": "Divine manifestation is compared, at a stated distance, to mind taking shape in thoughts and signs.",
    "establishes": "Determinate expression is metaphysically important, not merely an observer’s optional inference.",
    "limit": "The analogy explicitly differs from divine nature; cannot import human learning or self-completion into God. Interpreting this through created reception is a constructive proposal.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited",
    "url_role": "Specialist orientation; not the directly consulted primary witness"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-ERI-PRESSURE",
    "author": "John Scottus Eriugena",
    "title": "Periphyseon (The Division of Nature)",
    "locus": "III.678C–D, p. 305; II.589B, pp. 195–196; III.689B, pp. 317–318 (inherited E5–E8)",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scottus-eriugena/",
    "status": "Inherited supplied primary quotations; no fresh complete critical-edition collation.",
    "edition": "Sheldon-Williams/O’Meara translation, 1987.",
    "claim": "Strong unity language and determinate self-knowing through theophany create an interpretive tension.",
    "establishes": "The adopted account must explicitly refuse numerical God–creature identity and completion of God by creation if either is required by the historical text.",
    "limit": "Do not harmonize away the strong wording. Preserve “as it were” and “in something” in III.689B. III.678D says the immediate unity passage is not about the Incarnation.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited",
    "url_role": "Specialist orientation; not the directly consulted primary witness"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-ERI-SEP",
    "author": "Dermot Moran",
    "title": "John Scottus Eriugena, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy",
    "locus": "§§3.3–3.4; selected §3.9 passages on human nature and unity",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scottus-eriugena/",
    "status": "Fresh publisher consultation of selected passages, 12 October 2026.",
    "edition": "Substantive revision 30 October 2019; current publisher text.",
    "claim": "Categorical transcendence, theophanic self-manifestation, and Creator/created distinction coexist with strong unity language.",
    "establishes": "Confirms the need for critical retrieval rather than an effortless historical synthesis; provides I.455B and IV.796B as primary leads.",
    "limit": "I.455B and IV.796B are secondary-located in this pass, not directly collated primary quotations. The article offers an interpretation that must be distinguished from the project’s constructive choice.",
    "source_type": "secondary",
    "consultation_class": "secondary"
  },
  {
    "id": "RX-CV",
    "author": "Benedict XVI (Joseph Ratzinger)",
    "title": "Caritas in veritate",
    "locus": "§§2–5, 52–55; especially §§53–54",
    "url": "https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate.html",
    "consulted_url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jackransomlovell/popes/master/encyclicals_texts/Benedict%20XVI/Caritas%20in%20veritate%20%28June%2029%2C%202009%29%20%20BENEDICT%20XVI.txt",
    "status": "consulted-primary-transcript",
    "edition": "Official English text represented by an unofficial Vatican-scraping transcript; 29 June 2009. Official endpoint inaccessible and not line-collated.",
    "claim": "Metaphysical evaluation of relation; unity and openness can preserve personal and cultural identity; charity requires truth.",
    "establishes": "Theological and social affirmation of communion that preserves persons; a reason to examine real relations without counting every personal difference as a constituent part.",
    "limit": "Does not prove how divine action can be free while God remains intrinsically unchanged. Human growth through relationships does not establish divine change. Trinitarian personal origins are not alternative acts of creation.",
    "quote": "true openness does not mean loss of individual identity",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "direct",
    "url_role": "Official reading address; access was blocked in this consultation"
  },
  {
    "id": "RX-DCE",
    "author": "Benedict XVI (Joseph Ratzinger)",
    "title": "Deus caritas est",
    "locus": "§§9–10; especially §10",
    "url": "https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20051225_deus-caritas-est.html",
    "consulted_url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jackransomlovell/popes/master/encyclicals_texts/Benedict%20XVI/Deus%20caritas%20est%20%28December%2025%2C%202005%29%20%20BENEDICT%20XVI.txt",
    "status": "consulted-primary-transcript",
    "edition": "Official English text represented by an unofficial Vatican-scraping transcript; 25 December 2005. Official endpoint inaccessible and not line-collated.",
    "claim": "Universal divine source as Logos and personal love; communion does not dissolve God/creature distinction.",
    "establishes": "Christian theological conjunction of intelligibility, willed creation, elective love, and union without fusion.",
    "limit": "Does not establish contingency or explain what makes a particular divine action actual. Biblical language does not prove intrinsic divine change; the contrast with Aristotle is not a complete historical assessment.",
    "quote": "both God and man remain themselves and yet become fully one",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "direct",
    "url_role": "Official reading address; access was blocked in this consultation"
  },
  {
    "id": "RX-SS",
    "author": "Benedict XVI (Joseph Ratzinger)",
    "title": "Spe salvi",
    "locus": "§§14–15",
    "url": "https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20071130_spe-salvi.html",
    "consulted_url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jackransomlovell/popes/master/encyclicals_texts/Benedict%20XVI/Spe%20salvi%20%28November%2030%2C%202007%29%20%20BENEDICT%20XVI.txt",
    "status": "consulted-primary-transcript",
    "edition": "Official English text represented by an unofficial Vatican-scraping transcript; 30 November 2007. Official endpoint inaccessible and not line-collated.",
    "claim": "Communal salvation and embodied historical responsibility.",
    "establishes": "Theological application: communion has communal and practical scope rather than isolated absorption into an absolute.",
    "limit": "Not an independent metaphysical bridge to divine simplicity, freedom, or knowledge without learning from effects.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "direct",
    "url_role": "Official reading address; access was blocked in this consultation"
  },
  {
    "id": "RX-PERSON",
    "author": "Joseph Ratzinger",
    "title": "Concerning the Notion of Person in Theology",
    "locus": "Communio 17 (1990), 439–454",
    "url": "https://www.communio-icr.com/articles/view/concerning-the-notion-of-person-in-theology",
    "status": "unconsulted-primary-lead",
    "edition": "Bibliographic lead only; publisher endpoint inaccessible.",
    "claim": "Potential further comparison concerning person and relation.",
    "establishes": "Nothing independently established by this research pass.",
    "limit": "Do not quote or attribute detailed technical arguments to this unconsulted essay; landing URL itself could not be verified against publisher output.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "lead",
    "url_role": "Unverified publisher lead"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-AQ-C",
    "author": "Thomas Aquinas",
    "title": "Summa theologiae",
    "locus": "I, q. 3, a. 7, respondeo",
    "url": "https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1003.htm#article7",
    "consulted_url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GITenberg/Summa-Theologica-Part-I--Prima-Pars-From-the-Complete-American-Edition_17611/master/17611.txt",
    "status": "Inherited directly consulted primary translation from Participation and Beyond Participation; not newly collated for page III.",
    "edition": "English Dominican Fathers, Complete American Edition; Gutenberg #17611 witness. New Advent is a public reading address.",
    "claim": "A composite depends upon the principles constituting it; divine simplicity uses several arguments.",
    "establishes": "A historical resource for the argument from dependence on constituents; different concepts do not by themselves establish proper parts.",
    "limit": "Efficient uncausedness alone does not prove full simplicity. The modern KD reconstruction is not Aquinas’s complete argument.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-AQ-K",
    "author": "Thomas Aquinas",
    "title": "Summa theologiae",
    "locus": "I, q. 14, aa. 5, 8–9; especially a. 8, respondeo and ad 1/ad 3",
    "url": "https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1014.htm",
    "consulted_url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GITenberg/Summa-Theologica-Part-I--Prima-Pars-From-the-Complete-American-Edition_17611/master/17611.txt",
    "status": "Inherited direct consultation of aa. 5 and 8 in Beyond Participation; a. 9 inherited from manuscript register N11, not freshly checked here.",
    "edition": "English Dominican Fathers translation; Gutenberg #17611 and inherited manuscript source register.",
    "claim": "God knows effects through himself; knowledge causes things as joined to will; possibility-knowledge differs from realization.",
    "establishes": "Choice, knowledge through causing, and knowledge of possibilities need distinct explanations.",
    "limit": "Does not independently establish God’s existence, unrestricted cognitive perfection, knowledge of a particular actual choice, or knowledge of every permitted creaturely act.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-AQ-W",
    "author": "Thomas Aquinas",
    "title": "Summa theologiae",
    "locus": "I, q. 19, aa. 2–3; a. 3, respondeo and ad 5",
    "url": "https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1019.htm",
    "consulted_url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GITenberg/Summa-Theologica-Part-I--Prima-Pars-From-the-Complete-American-Edition_17611/master/17611.txt",
    "status": "Inherited directly consulted primary translation from Beyond Participation; no new critical collation for page III.",
    "edition": "English Dominican Fathers translation; Gutenberg #17611 witness.",
    "claim": "Necessary willing of divine goodness does not make willing creatures absolutely necessary; divine will determines itself toward things with no necessary relation.",
    "establishes": "A rational-voluntary resource for contingent communication; distinguishes necessity by supposition from absolute necessity.",
    "limit": "The account of reasons, purposes, and agency still needs defense. Neither non-exhaustion alone nor this quotation settles whether God remains intrinsically the same across alternative creations.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-AQ-R",
    "author": "Thomas Aquinas",
    "title": "Summa theologiae",
    "locus": "I, q. 45, a. 3; especially ad 1",
    "url": "https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1045.htm#article3",
    "status": "Inherited manuscript source register N11; translation check reported there, not repeated for page III.",
    "edition": "English Dominican Fathers translation, New Advent/CCEL as reported in the inherited manuscript register.",
    "claim": "Active creation is divine action with reference to the creature; created dependence does not require a corresponding intrinsic divine accident.",
    "establishes": "A classical source for distinguishing divine action in relation to creatures from creatures’ real dependence on God.",
    "limit": "Creation understood as a relation does not by itself explain free intentional choice, control, or justified knowledge. This account does not establish the Trinity or the Incarnation.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-AU-FIN",
    "author": "Augustine",
    "title": "Confessions",
    "locus": "IV.10.15",
    "url": "https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/110104.htm",
    "status": "Inherited manuscript primary quotation, register N5; not freshly consulted for page III.",
    "edition": "J. G. Pilkington translation, NPNF first series I (1887); inherited structural locus.",
    "claim": "Successive words pass as the whole utterance is completed.",
    "establishes": "A historical illustration of how temporal succession can contribute to an achieved whole.",
    "limit": "The claim that finite conditions partly constitute some goods is the project’s constructive extension. This passage does not show that every loss or suffering is beneficial.",
    "quote": "Unless one word pass away when it has sounded its part.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-AU-IDEAS",
    "author": "Augustine",
    "title": "De diversis quaestionibus octoginta tribus (Eighty-three Different Questions)",
    "locus": "q. 46, especially §§1–2, De ideis",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/augustine/",
    "status": "Inherited primary bibliographic lead from Participation; q. 46 was not directly consulted in the website research and is not freshly verified here.",
    "edition": "No primary critical-edition collation performed in this research pass.",
    "claim": "Proposed further control for ideas as immutable formative reasons in divine intelligence.",
    "establishes": "Nothing independently established by this unconsulted primary lead; the broader exemplar account has other consulted witnesses.",
    "limit": "Do not treat the link as a primary witness or quote this question as newly verified. Exemplar intelligibility still differs from actual creative selection.",
    "url_role": "Specialist orientation; exact primary locus supplied as an unconsulted lead",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "lead"
  },
  {
    "id": "RD-NW",
    "author": "John Henry Newman",
    "title": "An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine",
    "locus": "Part II, chapter V, §§I–VII; opening §4 on varying cogency, independence, and applicability",
    "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/35110",
    "consulted_url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GITenberg/An-Essay-on-the-Development-of-Christian-Doctrine_35110/master/35110.txt",
    "status": "Inherited directly consulted primary witness from Participation; no new edition collation for page III.",
    "edition": "Project Gutenberg #35110 / GITenberg transcription.",
    "claim": "Seven notes: preservation of type; continuity of principles; power of assimilation; logical sequence; anticipation of its future; conservative action upon its past; chronic vigour.",
    "establishes": "An analogical discipline for constructive synthesis that conserves principles and prior achievements while clarifying tensions.",
    "limit": "Not an ecclesial certification, proof of new metaphysical premises, or license to harmonize contradiction. A new page cannot already demonstrate chronic historical vigour.",
    "source_type": "primary",
    "consultation_class": "inherited"
  }
]